Trump officials play Biden blame game as screwworm spreads
As cases of New World screwworm spread and threaten the beef and cattle industry, the Trump administration is rolling out a familiar playbook: Blame former President Biden. The parasitic fly had beenโฆ
As cases of New World screwworm spread and threatenย theย beefย and cattle industry, the Trump administration is rolling out a familiar playbook: Blameย f
Read Full Story at The Hill โWhy This Matters
The Trump administration's decision to pivot blame to Biden amid a worsening New World screwworm outbreak underscores a broader pattern of political opportunism during crises. Beyond the immediate economic threat to the beef and dairy industries, this episode exposes how public health and agricultural vulnerabilities are increasingly weaponized in partisan narratives, potentially undermining trust in scientific and regulatory responses.
Background Context
New World screwworm, a parasitic fly that infests livestock, was declared eradicated from the U.S. in 2006 after a decades-long eradication program. However, recent cases in Florida and Alabamaโlinked to migrating wildlifeโhave reignited concerns about border security and invasive species management. Historically, screwworm outbreaks have been tied to underfunded veterinary infrastructure in neighboring countries, a point often glossed over in political finger-pointing.
What Happens Next
The administrationโs framing could delay coordinated federal action if the narrative takes hold that the crisis stems from prior policy failures rather than current gaps in surveillance or response. Meanwhile, cattle producers face mounting pressure to mitigate losses, while regulators must navigate a blame cycle that distracts from practical solutions like enhanced border inspections or interagency collaboration.
Bigger Picture
This episode reflects a growing trend where environmental and agricultural crises are politicized along partisan lines, mirroring the handling of past outbreaks like avian flu or African swine fever. Such dynamics risk eroding bipartisan support for foundational programs like the National Animal Health Surveillance System, which rely on long-term funding and cooperation across administrations.

